Archive

Archive for the ‘Coriolis and Thermal Mass Flow’ Category

Brooks Set to Unveil “Smarter” Mass Flow Controller at SEMICON China

March 12th, 2013 No comments

Here at Brooks, we’re gearing up for a big trip — to Shanghai! For the first time, we’ll be exhibiting at SEMICON China from March 19-21. We’re sharing booth 5505 with our valued partner SCH Electronics, and look forward to showcasing our high-performance digital solutions for flow, vacuum and pressure measurement.

But the big news is that Brooks will be launching the revolutionary GF135 pressure transient insensitive mass flow controller (MFC) at SEMICON China. The GF135 improves yield and uptime for semiconductor manufacturers with real-time integral rate-of-decay measurement and advanced diagnostic capabilities. These diagnostics enable users to verify accuracy, check valve leak-by and monitor sensor drift without stopping production. The MFC provides market-leading actual process gas accuracy and ultra-fast flow settling time for reduced process cycle time. Read more…

Phlow in Philadelphia: Pittcon 2013

March 11th, 2013 No comments

For the first time, Pittcon will be held at the Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia, and we’re thrilled to have the hustle and bustle of this show right in our backyard. Brooks will be at booth 702 offering product demos and showcasing our market-leading mass flow controllers, vacuum capacitance manometers and pressure transducers.

We’re most excited to reveal our expanded portfolio of GF 40/80 Series mass flow controllers at Pittcon. The GF 40/80 Series leads the market in long-term zero stability at less than 0.5% per year. What does that mean? The devices will return more reliable accuracy data for a longer period of time than competitive devices. And with MulitFlo™ inside, users can re-program the gas and/or range of the devices in minutes without the trouble and cost of removing them from service. Read more…

How a Remote Valve on Your Liquid Controller Can Ease Your Process Pain

December 19th, 2012 No comments

If you can answer yes to any of these questions, your process could benefit from using a remote valve configuration on your controller:Quantim Coriolis Mass Flow Controller With Remote Valve

  1. Are you utilizing high pressures in your applications (> 1500 psig)?
  2. Have you had issues with down time due to clogged valves?
  3. Does your process utilize a gas that acts as a super-critical fluid?

Read more…

Setting Up Shop at the 2012 Fuel Cell Seminar & Exposition

October 24th, 2012 No comments

2012 Fuel Cell Seminar & ExpositionIn just two weeks, Brooks will set up shop at the 2012 Fuel Cell Seminar & Exposition. This year’s event will be held at the Mohegan Sun in Uncasville, Conn. Stop by booth 211 and say hello to me and other Brooks reps, as we talk about our ongoing innovations in flow instrumentation for fuel cell manufacturing, and demo some of our mass flow controllers. Contact me to schedule a demo of our mass flow controllers, and you’ll receive a 4 GB USB drive in the shape of a Brooks GF 40/80 Series MFC.

Read more…

Don’t Take Control – Cascade It (Part 1)

September 26th, 2012 No comments

Flow control can be challenging at times – that fact keeps all of us here at Brooks employed! Many users who need to control gas flow in their process don’t want to spend a lot of time setting up their own flow control scheme, and instead purchase a mass flow controller. Read more…

Normally Open Control Valve Extends Range of Applications

September 18th, 2012 1 comment

Normally Open Valve Option on Brooks Instrument Mass Flow ControllersRecently, we announced the release of the “normally open” valve option on our GF40 mass flow controller. As a refresher, a normally open valve is one that is open until the solenoid actuator is energized to reposition the valve to control the flow rate. Normally open valves are desirable in applications where it is preferable for the valve to remain open when the MFC is not powered.

So how do you know when the “normally open” valve option is right for your process?

Well, the application is what drives the need. For those of you working with non-hazardous gas applications or processes that need a fully open valve in the event of a process interruption, this option is a perfect fit. Under a fault condition, you want gas to continue flowing. So, for example, if you’re running a furnace system and need to continue flushing your tube or chamber, and your facility loses power, the valve would go full open to provide maximum purge gas flow from the system. If your business is in biopharmaceuticals, chemical research, glass manufacturing or petrochemicals, consider the normally open valve option for your process.

For more information:

All Mass Flow Measurements Are NOT Created Equal

September 4th, 2012 No comments

Brooks Instrument Blog Post - All Mass Flow Measurements Are Not Created Equal

 

I was perusing Control Global’s website this morning, (an aside – they have GREAT stuff on their site, check it out if you haven’t been there before) and ran across a new white paper discussing thermal mass flow meters. It reminded me of an important distinction we commonly discuss with customers: inferred mass flow measurement vs. direct mass flow measurement.

Read more…

Video: How a single mass flow controller can do the job of ten others

May 17th, 2012 No comments


 

Thermal mass flow controllers are traditionally calibrated for a specific gas, a desired flow range, and a set of operating conditions. Over time, the use of conversion factors based on a ratio of specific heats between gases came into use as a way for users to configure a single mass flow controller for multiple gases. This method of configuring a mass flow controller for multiple gases is still common today – you’re using it if your device lets you select a gas by: rotating a knob, pressing a button on a display, or sending an RS232 command to the device.

Accuracy is the primary issue with this method of conversion. Converting flow rates between the calibration gas and another gas based on a ratio of specific heats can result in a mass flow control error of 5-6%. This error is the result of the conversion method because it ignores other property differences that exist between gases in the real world. If you’re changing the gas on your device with one of the actions above, ask the manufacturer of your mass flow controller what the accuracy of the device is for a gas other than the calibration gas.

P.S. If you’re told that such a device is linear in all the available gases and thus the mass flow accuracy doesn’t change when the gas is changed, RUN! This is not physically possible. Feel free to contact us for comparison data.

Multiflo by Brooks Instrument is a leap forward in configuring a mass flow controller for multiple gases because it converts based on gas differences in specific heats, densities, and viscosities. Multiflo-Capable mass flow controllers cut the conversion flow control error in half compared to devices that convert gases based on a specific heat ratio alone.

This video demonstrates how a Multiflo configuration is performed on a mass flow controller. We welcome your thoughts or questions in the comments below.

You can find more information on Multiflo-Capable mass flow controllers on the Brooks Instrument LinkedIn company page. Your local Brooks product expert would also be happy to help you configure a Multiflo-Capable mass flow controller for your applications using the information entered on this form.

If you’d like to read a bit more about instrumentation and process control, feel free to check out more of my contributions summarized on my Google Plus profile.

Flow control problems when backpressure changes? Choke the flow! (Part 3)

May 11th, 2012 No comments

In this series, we’ve been discussing a gas flow control challenge that users face when backpressure changes. In the first post, we discussed several gas flow control applications where this is a concern. In the second post, I described a flow effect called choked flow, which occurs when gas flow through an orifice reaches the speed of sound.

We already know that when gas is flowing through an orifice at the speed of sound, it’s moving faster than the gas can expand on the outlet side. We can get the gas flowing through the orifice at this speed by adjusting the ratio of inlet to outlet pressure. The minimum ratio of these pressures that results in choked flow can be calculated from the isentropic expansion factor of the gas. This ratio is 1.8 to 2.2 for many common gases.

This means that when gas flow control is needed into something with a changing pressure, we can disregard the downstream pressure changes with most gases by using an upstream pressure that is at least 2.2 times the highest downstream pressure. This ratio should always be calculated using absolute pressures. So if a desired mass flow rate needs to be maintained when downstream pressure ranges from 25 to 75 PSIA, the flow will stay steady if the inlet pressure to the orifice is set at 165 PSIA or higher.

Now that we can use choked flow to maintain a mass flow rate into a changing backpressure, what happens if we need to increase the flow rate? Here are two options:

  • Increase Inlet Pressure: A higher inlet pressure increases the density of the gas, which increases the mass flow rate passing through an orifice. This can be achieved by adding a regulator upstream of an orifice, or with a pressure controller if automation or premium accuracy is desirable. This is not the preferred approach for many of our customers for three reasons: (1) the purchase of both an orifice and another instrument that can change the pressure is required; (2) there is no direct feedback of the flow rate to the user; and (3) choked flow can’t occur with some orifice designs.
  • Increase the Orifice Size: This is the approach that users of mass flow controllers take. The control valve in a mass flow controller has numerous positions between fully open and fully closed. The valve position changes to achieve each desired flow rate, which essentially changes the size of the orifice in the valve. This is the preferred approach for many of our customers because it is a single instrument to install, it is automated, and it provides real-time feedback of the flow rate provided to the process.

But what if the maximum downstream pressure is higher than 75 PSIA? Our clients operating at higher pressures are having success with the market-leading SLA series mass flow controller.  The SLA can operate at pressures up to 4,500 PSIG. It is also capable of operating indoors, outdoors or in hazardous areas, and it provides numerous electrical communication options to meet the needs of a wide range of flow control applications.

If you’d like to discuss an application like this in more detail, you’re welcome to enter some application and contact information into this page to be contacted by your local Brooks product expert. Feel free to give my colleagues and I a call if we can help as well. We can be reached at 215-362-3500, ext 3000.

If you’d like to read a bit more about instrumentation and process control, feel free to check out more of my contributions summarized on my Google Plus profile.

Flow control problems when backpressure changes? Choke the flow! (Part 2)

April 25th, 2012 No comments

In my last post, we discussed several applications for mass flow controllers where precise flow control is needed despite backpressure changes. I introduced a flow effect called choked flow, which many of our customers use in these applications to ignore downstream pressure changes. This is also referred to as sonic flow or critical flow.

To my flow-savvy readers: You’ll notice that I’m discussing choked flow in conceptual terms rather than demonstrating complex formulas and calculations. Don’t be alarmed! Feel free to post any additional thoughts you have on this topic in the comments below.

The sketch to the right shows gas flow through a typical orifice. The green shaded areas are high pressure, low velocity flow areas, and the blue area is a low pressure, high velocity flow area. Inlet gas flow speeds up as it compresses to pass through the orifice, then re-expands and slows back down on the outlet side. The flow rate through the orifice is primarily set by the inlet and outlet pressures, as well as the diameter of the orifice opening. Gas temperature also plays a part.

A gas expands in a space as its molecules collide with whatever else is present. (pipe walls, other gas molecules, etc.) Every gas expands at its own rate, and pressure increases in a gas are a result of squeezing more gas molecules into the same amount of space. Applying these factors to the orifice flow pictured, gas expansion causes some of the molecules that are expanding in the green area on the outlet side to collide with and deflect the “fast” molecules in the blue area. If the pressure rises in the green area on the outlet side, it’s because there are more gas molecules present in the same amount of space.

More molecules in the green outlet area mean that more molecules deflect the “fast” molecules in the blue area. This reduces flow velocity in the blue area, which is what reduces the flow rate passing through an orifice at higher backpressures. If the pressure drops in the green outlet area, it means that fewer molecules are present in that space, which results in fewer deflections of “fast” blue molecules. This causes a higher velocity in the blue area, and thus a higher flow rate when the backpressure drops.

Choked flow occurs when the flow velocity in the blue area reaches the speed of sound. At this velocity, the molecules in the blue area are essentially traveling faster than the molecules in the green outlet area are expanding. So deflection between molecules at the blue/green border doesn’t reduce velocity in the blue area. With a fixed inlet pressure, the outlet pressure can change over a wide range without changing the mass flow rate as long as the conditions to maintain choked flow remain in place.

So how can we reach the conditions needed to maintain choked flow? We’ll cover that in our final post in this series.

Where did the names choked flow, sonic flow, and/or critical flow come from? Please post where you think one of these names came from in the comments. The first poster that correctly lists the reason for each of the names will win a 4 GB jump drive in the shape of a mass flow controller.

If you’d like to read a bit more about instrumentation and process control, feel free to check out more of my contributions summarized on my Google Plus profile.